News sentiment models analyse financial news, blogs, and corporate disclosures to identify positive or negative tones. These models help traders predict market volatility, manage risk, and make informed decisions. Here’s a quick breakdown:

• How do they work? They use text analysis to assign sentiment scores to financial content (e.g., news, tweets, filings).
• Why does it matter? Negative sentiment typically increases market volatility more than positive sentiment reduces it.
• Key tools: Lexicon-based models (e.g., VADER), machine learning models (e.g., Random Forest), and deep learning models (e.g., FinBERT).
• Applications: Predicting volatility trends, adjusting trading strategies, and identifying event-driven opportunities.

For example, a study using VADER on 545,979 tweets achieved 65% accuracy in forecasting FTSE100 volatility. Machine learning models like Random Forest reached up to 92% accuracy for specific stocks. Deep learning tools, while powerful, require more resources and are best suited for professional news.

Rule-Based and Lexicon-Based Models

These models work by comparing words in news articles to predefined sentiment dictionaries. For instance, the Loughran-McDonald dictionary is tailored for financial text, classifying words as positive or negative based on their use in corporate filings. These models are fast, transparent, and don’t require training data.

However, general-purpose dictionaries often falter in financial applications. For example, the Harvard dictionary misclassifies about 75% of negative words when applied to 10‑K filings. Despite this, tools like VADER remain a go-to option for analysing large volumes of social media content due to their ability to handle informal language.

Machine Learning-Based Models

Unlike lexicon-based methods, machine learning models, such as Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forests, and Decision Trees, learn from labelled training data. By leveraging text features like bag-of-words or Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) for topic modelling, these models can pinpoint market-moving themes like earnings reports or credit rating updates that influence volatility.

A study analysing Apple Inc. news demonstrated that Random Forest models achieved accuracy rates between 88% and 92%, outperforming SVM (86%) and Naive Bayes (83%). Meanwhile, LDA-based classifiers showed 63% to 65% accuracy in predicting market volatility changes. While LDA helps reduce data complexity, it can sometimes overfit noisy datasets.

Machine learning models complement lexicon-based approaches by uncovering deeper, market-relevant insights, adding another layer to sentiment analysis.

Deep Learning Models

Neural networks like Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and FinBERT represent the latest advancements in sentiment analysis. These models excel at capturing how sentiment shifts over time, making them particularly effective for analysing professional news and structured reports. FinBERT, for example, achieved 86% accuracy on the Financial PhraseBank dataset.

However, these models come with challenges. They require significant computational resources and are often criticised for their “black box” nature, making it hard to interpret their decisions. Moreover, their performance can vary depending on the data source. For instance, FinBERT’s accuracy drops to 53% on Twitter data, while VADER achieves 68% on the same platform. This highlights the importance of matching the model to the dataset – deep learning shines with professional content, while lexicon-based tools are better suited for informal social media text.

Here’s a summary of the strengths and limitations of each model type:

These models form the foundation of sentiment analysis pipelines, providing the tools needed for precise volatility tracking and decision-making.

Building a News Sentiment Pipeline for Volatility Analysis

Let’s explore how to transform raw news data into actionable insights for volatility analysis. This process involves three key steps: collecting and preprocessing data, scoring sentiment and engineering features, and integrating sentiment into volatility models.

Data Collection and Preprocessing

The first step is to separate macroeconomic news from firm-specific news. Research from Aarhus University highlights that macroeconomic sentiment plays a vital role in improving long-term volatility predictions for individual stocks and indices like the S&P 500. On the other hand, firm-specific news proves more useful for short-term forecasts, especially when tracking the news count of overnight stories between trading sessions.

For traders in Singapore (SGT), it’s essential to convert GMT timestamps to local market hours. Sentiment from weekends or holidays should be aggregated and applied to the next trading day. For instance, sentiment from Saturday and Sunday would influence Monday’s market opening.

To ensure precise classification of financial text, use finance-specific lexicons like Loughran-McDonald. General-purpose dictionaries often misinterpret financial terms – for example, words like “liability” or “risk” might be neutral in corporate filings but could be flagged incorrectly. When dealing with social media data, tools like VADER are particularly effective. They can handle informal language, emojis, and punctuation intensity without requiring extensive customisation.

Sentiment Scoring and Feature Engineering

Once the text is processed, convert it into sentiment scores and consider the volume of news for added depth. As Simon Tranberg Bodilsen and Asger Lunde observed, including the news count of firm-specific overnight stories significantly improves one-period-ahead volatility forecasts.

Incorporate temporal features such as flags for “is_quarter_end”, as stock prices and volatility often shift around quarterly reporting periods. Pair sentiment data with technical indicators – like 10-day and 50-day moving averages – and OHLC (open, high, low, close) price data to provide a richer market context.

Normalising features, such as through StandardScaler, enables the effective combination of sentiment scores, news volumes, and price data. Traders in Singapore can also benefit from integrating sentiment data from regional markets like Hong Kong’s Hang Seng and Tokyo’s Nikkei, as cross-border sentiment flows often impact local trading dynamics.

These refined features enhance the predictive power of volatility models, creating more reliable trading signals.

Combining Sentiment with Volatility Models

The sentiment scores generated earlier can be integrated as exogenous variables in models like GARCH or HAR. This step strengthens the models by accounting for information shocks that traditional methods may overlook.

It’s crucial to consider sentiment asymmetry – negative sentiment often triggers sharper volatility spikes compared to the calming effect of positive sentiment. Andrea Cantamessa, an independent researcher, notes that including scheduled news and negative sentiment volumes improves volatility forecasts. When using machine learning models, evaluate their performance with ROC-AUC scores. This approach, which measures soft probabilities, provides more nuanced trading signals compared to simple binary classifications.

To accommodate different reaction speeds among market participants, aggregate news sentiment over multiple time horizons – daily, weekly, and monthly. Using professional news providers like RavenPack or Thomson Reuters can also help. These platforms pre-filter stories for material relevance, reducing the noise found in raw web or social media data. Such filtering proves particularly valuable when working with high-frequency data for intraday volatility strategies.

sbb-itb-466c9b0

How to Use Sentiment-Driven Volatility Analysis in Trading

This stage involves taking your sentiment-based volatility forecasts and applying them to make smarter trading decisions. By using sentiment analysis, you can predict market volatility, manage risk, and spot trading opportunities.

Volatility Forecasting and Risk Management

Sentiment indicators can alert you to potential volatility spikes before they fully take shape. When tools like the VIX, Put/Call ratios, and sentiment from news sources align, your predictions become more dependable. This alignment serves as an early warning system, helping you tweak your risk exposure accordingly.

Negative news tends to amplify volatility more than positive news. During periods of extreme sentiment, it’s wise to reduce your position sizes and tighten stop-loss orders. For instance, when market sentiment hits extreme optimism and prices are still high, it often signals that a correction is around the corner.

The kind of news also plays a role in how far ahead you can forecast. Sentiment around macroeconomic news is better for making long-term volatility predictions for major indices like the S&P 500. On the other hand, firm-specific news, such as overnight updates, is more effective for short-term (next-day) forecasts.

“Volatility movements are more predictable than asset price movements when using financial news as machine learning input, and hence could potentially be exploited in pricing derivatives contracts via quantifying volatility.” – Atkins et al.

Position Sizing and Strategy Adjustments

Use these sentiment-driven forecasts to fine-tune your trade sizes and overall risk exposure. For example, a spike in overnight firm-specific news counts should prompt you to adjust your leverage for the following trading session. Similarly, if sentiment indicators point to increased uncertainty, scaling back your positions can help limit your exposure.

Stick to a disciplined risk management approach: risk only 1–2% of your capital per trade, cap daily losses at 1–2% of your account value, and adjust your positions when sentiment hits extremes. Sentiment can also guide sector rotation strategies. For instance, technology stocks often perform better in high-risk appetite environments, while defensive sectors tend to attract investors during cautious sentiment periods. The SG Global Sentiment Index (SGIXSENT), which was at 350.42 on 20 August 2025, offers a snapshot of the market’s mood and can aid in these decisions.

Event-Driven Trading Opportunities

Sentiment analysis doesn’t just help with risk adjustments; it also highlights specific trading opportunities tied to events. Firm-specific news – such as earnings reports or credit rating changes – often has a bigger impact on intraday volatility than macroeconomic news. Sentiment models focusing on macroeconomic announcements improved volatility forecasts for 404 major U.S. stocks by an average of 14.99% during days of extreme price swings.

Extreme sentiment levels can act as contrarian signals. For example, excessive pessimism paired with prices holding steady at key technical support levels often indicates a potential market bottom. On the flip side, extreme optimism can signal an overbought market that’s due for a correction. Interestingly, a strong negative correlation of -0.7 exists between positive sentiment from tweets and the next day’s market volatility.

Social media platforms like Twitter and StockTwits provide sentiment data that’s often quicker and more reactive than traditional news sources. This makes them particularly useful for high-frequency trading strategies. Markets often follow the principle of “buy on rumours, sell on news”, meaning social media sentiment can serve as a leading indicator, while traditional news tends to lag behind. Combining sentiment analysis with topic modelling has shown a directional prediction accuracy of 63% for volatility, proving its value for systematic trading approaches.

Conclusion: Using News Sentiment Models for Systematic Trading

Incorporating sentiment data into systematic trading strategies can provide a sharper edge in navigating market dynamics. For instance, combining news sentiment analysis with volatility models like GARCH enhances forecast accuracy. Macroeconomic sentiment data is particularly useful for long-term predictions, while firm-specific sentiment metrics improve next-day forecasts.

Adding topic modelling to sentiment analysis further refines predictions, achieving directional accuracy rates of 63–65%. Moreover, classifying news sentiment has been shown to improve stock trend predictions by 30% compared to random labelling. This approach becomes even more critical during volatile market conditions, where sentiment plays a larger role in explaining persistent volatility.

Sentiment-driven analysis also provides actionable insights for risk management. Negative sentiment, which tends to have a stronger impact on market volatility than positive news, can serve as an early warning signal. By tracking these signals, traders can adjust position sizes, tighten stop-loss levels, and better safeguard their capital during periods of heightened market emotion. These insights complement traditional price-based measures.

For those looking to adopt these strategies, structured education can be a game-changer. Collin Seow Trading Academy offers programmes like the Systematic Trader Program, which has garnered over 1,400 5-star reviews. This programme teaches traders how to integrate sentiment indicators with technical and fundamental analysis. Additionally, the academy’s TradersGPS system provides real-time insights, helping traders eliminate emotional decision-making – a crucial advantage during news-driven market swings.

If you’re new to these concepts, the free Market Timing 101 e-course is a great starting point. It covers how sentiment and timing can influence your trade entries and exits. Coupled with strict risk controls and disciplined execution, using sentiment-driven forecasts can help you navigate market uncertainty while identifying promising trading opportunities.

FAQs

How can news sentiment models enhance trading strategies?

News sentiment models take unstructured data – like headlines or tweets – and turn it into quantitative sentiment scores (positive, negative, or neutral). These scores can then be fed into trading algorithms to help predict market movements. Studies have shown that sentiment indices often align with price returns and market volatility, making them a helpful resource for traders.

Using sentiment data, traders can fine-tune their strategies in several key ways:

• Improved risk management: With better estimates of volatility, traders can size their positions more accurately and set stop-loss levels to minimise potential losses.
• Timely trade signals: Spikes in negative sentiment might indicate increased volatility and opportunities for short-selling, while positive sentiment could support long positions.
• Dynamic hedging strategies: Sentiment-based forecasts can guide traders in adjusting their hedging approaches, such as boosting options exposure during periods of expected volatility.

Platforms like Collin Seow Trading Academy offer tools and guidance to help traders incorporate sentiment models into their strategies. Through courses and live webinars, they provide actionable insights to enhance trading performance.

What challenges do deep learning models face in news sentiment analysis?

Deep learning models used for sentiment analysis come with their own set of hurdles. For starters, they need large, well-labelled datasets to train effectively. Gathering such data isn’t just tedious – it can also be a costly and time-consuming process. On top of that, these models require substantial computational power and time to function, which can put them out of reach for smaller businesses or independent traders.

Another sticking point is their lack of transparency. It’s often hard to figure out how these models arrive at their predictions, which can make users hesitant to fully trust their outputs. Plus, their effectiveness tends to be market-specific. In other words, a model that works well in one financial market might fall short in another, limiting its broader application. Because of these challenges, traders need to weigh up whether these models truly fit their goals and trading strategies.

What is the role of sentiment asymmetry in predicting market volatility?

Sentiment imbalances are key to understanding market volatility, as negative news tends to create sharper price swings compared to positive news. This phenomenon becomes even more evident during times of heightened volatility, where pessimistic market sentiment can dramatically intensify reactions.

By recognising how bullish and bearish sentiments influence markets differently, traders can refine their volatility models. This allows for more precise decision-making and improved risk management, especially in fast-changing market environments.