Cross-asset correlation is about how different investments move together. In emerging markets, this is crucial because these regions are more volatile and sensitive to global events. For example, during crises, assets like equities and bonds often move in the same direction, reducing the benefits of diversification.

Key points to know:

• Correlation ranges from -1.0 (opposite moves) to +1.0 (perfectly aligned).
• In 2022, inflation caused stock-bond correlations to turn positive, leading to a 16% drop in traditional 60/40 portfolios.
• Emerging markets are heavily influenced by global cycles, commodity prices, and capital flows.

For Singapore traders, understanding these relationships is essential. The Singapore dollar (SGD) and the Straits Times Index (STI) often reflect regional economic trends. Tools like rolling correlations and models such as DCC-GARCH help track these shifts over time.

Diversification isn’t always reliable during market stress. Correlations tend to spike, especially when global volatility rises (e.g., VIX > 30). For effective risk management, traders need to:

1. Use advanced tools like copulas to model extreme scenarios.
2. Monitor short-term and long-term correlation changes.
3. Stress-test portfolios for high-correlation conditions.

Emerging markets require deeper analysis due to their complexity. By staying vigilant and using systematic approaches, you can better manage risks and seize opportunities in these dynamic markets.

Understanding Cross-Asset Correlation

How Correlation is Measured

The Pearson correlation coefficient is the go-to method for assessing how assets move in relation to one another. It produces a value ranging from -1.0 (completely inverse movement) to +1.0 (perfectly aligned movement), with zero indicating no discernible relationship.

However, relying on a single correlation figure can be misleading. Market dynamics are constantly shifting, and relationships between assets evolve over time. That’s why traders often turn to rolling correlations, which analyse asset relationships over fixed time windows. This approach uncovers trends and patterns that a static correlation score might miss.

In emerging markets, analysts frequently distinguish between return correlations and volatility correlations. To capture periods of heightened market turbulence, models like E-GARCH (1,1) are employed to identify “volatility clustering”, where high-volatility periods tend to group together. For more complex, non-linear market behaviours, advanced traders rely on tools such as MFDCCA.

This foundation of measurement is critical when diving into specific emerging market asset pairings.

Key Cross-Asset Pairs in Emerging Markets

Using these techniques, we can better understand the unique relationships between various emerging market asset classes. For instance, EM equities versus developed market equities tend to exhibit consistent correlations that grow stronger over extended periods, largely influenced by global economic cycles. On the other hand, EM equities versus commodities – like oil, copper, and wheat – show complex, non-linear relationships. Oil, in particular, often serves as a hedge for EM equity positions.

Currency dynamics play a major role as well. For example, commodities and FX pairs often have an inverse relationship: when the US dollar weakens, dollar-denominated commodity prices typically rise. Oil prices frequently move inversely with the Brazilian real, while metals show similar behaviour with the South African rand.

In the fixed-income space, hard currency EM debt often mirrors equity performance, thriving when both US and EM equities are on the rise. Meanwhile, gold and the US dollar remain reliable hedging options for EM equity exposure. Cryptocurrencies, however, still display weaker links to emerging markets, making them less effective as hedging tools for EM equity risk at this stage.

These interconnected relationships are vital for making informed portfolio decisions in emerging markets.

Impact of Correlation on Diversification

Correlation plays a critical role in determining whether your portfolio is genuinely diversified. When correlations between instruments in your portfolio exceed 0.7, you may be overly concentrated. In essence, you’re holding assets that behave too similarly, reducing the benefits of diversification.

Market stress further complicates matters. During turbulent periods, such as when US equity volatility (measured by the VIX) rises above 28.99, correlations between most asset classes and US equities tend to spike. The exceptions? Cash and government bonds, which maintain their low beta to US equities even in volatile conditions.

“Asset classes that historically have had low correlation may now represent exposure to the same risk factors. This is referred to as unintentional risk.” – PIMCO

Inflation adds another layer of complexity. When US CPI surpasses 4.13%, traditional safe-haven assets like government bonds can start moving in tandem with equities, undermining their role as diversification tools when they’re needed most. For Singapore-based traders managing exposure to emerging markets, this highlights the importance of constant vigilance. It’s essential to evaluate whether your portfolio truly reflects a balanced distribution of risk or if it’s masking concentrated exposures under the guise of diversification. This theme ties directly into the systematic trading strategies discussed later.

sbb-itb-466c9b0

How Cross-Asset Correlations Behave in Emerging Markets

Correlation During Market Stress

Emerging market (EM) assets often experience a sharp rise in correlation when global risk sentiment takes a hit. During crises, these assets tend to move in sync with other high-risk investments, like US high-yield corporate bonds, as investors retreat from riskier positions. This phenomenon, often referred to as contagion, can wipe out the benefits of diversification right when they’re needed most.

Take the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis and the 1998 Russian/LTCM crises as examples – during these periods, EM sovereign bonds reached their highest correlation with US high-yield bonds. Interestingly, the 2007–2009 global financial crisis told a slightly different story. While EM sovereign spreads rose, the increase was less than half of what was seen in US high-yield corporate spreads.

“Investors’ risk appetite quickly shifts during crises, affecting even previously uncorrelated markets.” – Federal Reserve Board

The VIX, often called the “fear index”, is a handy tool for tracking these shifts. When the VIX spikes above 30, it signals heightened volatility and dramatic price swings across EM assets. At these levels, assets that usually move independently can start mirroring each other, unintentionally concentrating risk in portfolios.

This heightened sensitivity to global stress sets the stage for the unique structural factors shaping EM markets.

Structural Drivers in Emerging Markets

Beyond simple correlation metrics, several key factors drive the synchronisation of EM asset movements. Liquidity constraints and the sensitivity of capital flows play a big role. When global investors need to raise cash quickly, EM assets are often the first to go, regardless of the underlying fundamentals of specific countries. This behaviour causes prices across otherwise unrelated markets to move in tandem.

Another major factor is the concentration of global asset management. In 2012, the top 20 firms managed about 40% (S$28 trillion) of the assets of the top 500 companies. When these institutional players shift their allocations, the ripple effects are felt across multiple EM asset classes simultaneously.

Commodity dependence adds another layer of complexity. Many EM economies rely heavily on commodity exports, creating direct links between commodity prices, local currencies, and equity markets. Factors like economic policy uncertainty (EPU), financial volatility, and tighter credit conditions tend to push correlations higher. Conversely, stronger economic growth and rising consumer confidence help bring them down.

Then there’s the benchmark effect, which has a significant influence. For instance, two JPMorgan EMBI Global indices are benchmarks for 38% of the assets managed by actively managed EM bond funds. This concentrated reliance on benchmarks leads to “benchmark hugging”, where fund managers align their portfolios closely with index weights to minimise career risk. The outcome? Increased cross-asset and cross-country correlations, as managers often trade in sync.

“The concentrated use of benchmarks and the directional co-movement of investor flows can generate correlated investment patterns that may create one-sided markets and exacerbate price fluctuations.” – Ken Miyajima and Ilhyock Shim, BIS

Time-Varying and Asymmetric Correlations

Emerging markets are anything but static, and their correlations evolve over time. They tend to rise sharply during periods of market turmoil. Research using multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis has shown that EM equities behave more like complex adaptive systems than efficient markets. Over longer time frames, the interconnectedness between assets grows stronger.

The asymmetry of these correlations is particularly relevant for traders. Correlations tend to spike more during downturns than during upswings. A study of 32 emerging and frontier markets highlighted this, showing that while asymmetry in volatility is less pronounced than in developed markets, the positive link between conditional volatility and correlations is consistent across most countries.

“The relationship between volatility and correlations is positive and significant in most countries. Thus, diversification benefits decrease during periods of higher volatility.” – Eduard Baumöhl, PhD, Lecturer in Financial Markets

For traders in Singapore, this underscores the need for dynamic correlation analysis. Using rolling correlation windows can help track these shifts, while models like Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC) or E-GARCH are effective for estimating time-varying relationships. These tools can detect patterns like volatility clustering and leverage effects.

Relying on static correlation figures from calm periods can lead to underestimating risks. A portfolio built solely on historical averages might appear diversified but could become dangerously concentrated during volatile market conditions – precisely when diversification is most needed.

Tools and Methods for Analyzing Cross-Asset Correlations

Data Sources and Market Coverage

Reliable data is the foundation of effective correlation analysis. It plays a crucial role in risk management and informs the methods used for systematic trading strategies. Platforms like Bloomberg Terminal and Reuters are widely regarded as essential tools for accessing real-time pricing, volatility metrics, and sentiment indicators across emerging market assets. For those focused on building systematic strategies, historical datasets from providers like Morningstar Direct, FactSet, and Haver Analytics offer a wealth of information spanning equities, bonds, commodities, and currencies.

For traders based in Singapore, local resources add a distinct edge. The Singapore Exchange (SGX) publishes weekly reports detailing institutional activity, foreign investor flows, and derivative positioning, which are invaluable for analysing regional correlations. Additionally, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) provides quarterly business sentiment surveys that offer forward-looking data for correlation modelling. For a quick snapshot of market sentiment, the SG Global Sentiment Index (SGIXSENT), managed by S&P OpCo, LLC, recorded a reading of 350.42 as of 20 August 2025.

Many brokerage platforms now integrate tools like sentiment data, put/call ratios, and institutional flow information directly into price charts. This integration simplifies the process of identifying real-time shifts in correlations.

When working with emerging market data, it’s critical to verify data quality. Historical datasets should account for adjustments like stock splits and dividends to avoid skewed results. For Singapore traders analysing commodity-linked currencies, USD fluctuations must also be factored in, as most commodities are priced in USD. For example, the AUD/USD pair has historically shown an 80% correlation with gold prices, reflecting Australia’s role as a major gold exporter.

Practical Steps for Correlation Analysis

Once you’ve secured high-quality data, the next step is to follow a structured approach to assess cross-asset correlations accurately. Begin by calculating log returns instead of simple percentage changes. Log returns ensure stationarity, making the data more suitable for time-series analysis. For emerging markets, remember to account for non-synchronous trading hours – Asian markets close before European ones open – which can lead to misleading correlation patterns if ignored.

Using rolling windows is an effective way to track how correlations evolve over time. A 60-day rolling window captures short-term shifts, while a 3-year window highlights longer-term structural trends. For instance, the correlation coefficient between a diversified portfolio and the Morningstar US Market Index increased to 0.96 for the three years ending December 2022, compared to 0.87 for the period ending December 2004.

“About 40% of current commodity/equity correlation is a spillover from FX/equity correlation.”
– JP Morgan

A two-step DCC-GARCH process can refine your analysis. Start by using univariate GARCH models to address volatility clustering in individual assets. Then, apply these residuals to compute a time-varying correlation matrix. This method is particularly effective for emerging market assets, which often exhibit volatility clustering and leverage effects.

Avoid relying on average correlations during calm periods – they can be misleading. Instead, focus on high-volatility periods (e.g., when the VIX exceeds 30) to calculate tail correlations, which reveal how assets behave during extreme market conditions. Standard averages tend to overestimate diversification benefits during crises.

Keep an eye on your correlation matrices for divergence trading opportunities. For example, if two assets with a correlation above 0.75 show a significant price gap, you might consider selling the overvalued asset and buying the undervalued one. A case in point: CAD/USD and CAD/JPY generally maintain a 0.75 to 0.80 positive correlation with crude oil prices.

Advanced Quantitative Techniques

Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC) models provide a streamlined way to estimate time-varying correlations across multiple assets simultaneously. These models build on earlier methods and are particularly useful for capturing shifts in relationships over time.

Asymmetric DCC (A-DCC) models take this a step further by accounting for the fact that correlations often respond differently to negative versus positive market shocks. While this asymmetry is less common in emerging markets, it has been observed in specific cases, such as the Hungarian stock market. A-DCC models are also helpful in identifying “contagion effects”, where market linkages intensify significantly after a negative event.

“If the relationship between conditional volatility and the correlations is positive, this suggests that diversification benefits decrease during volatile periods, i.e., during the times when they are most valuable.”
– Eduard Baumöhl, PhD, University of Economics in Bratislava

For emerging markets, Multifractal Detrended Cross-Correlation Analysis (MFDCCA) is an effective tool. These markets often operate as complex systems, making traditional linear models insufficient. MFDCCA uncovers nonlinear dynamics and long-range correlations that Pearson coefficients might miss, offering deeper insights into non-stationary data.

Copula functions are another advanced method, allowing you to model the dependence structure between assets beyond simple linear correlations. They are particularly useful for analysing tail correlations and asymmetric dependencies. For instance, copulas can show how assets tend to move more closely together during market crashes than during rallies. This makes them invaluable for understanding how diversification benefits erode during stress periods.

Exponential GARCH (E-GARCH) models are particularly useful for capturing “leverage effects”, where negative shocks have a disproportionate impact on volatility compared to positive ones of the same magnitude. This is especially relevant for emerging market equities, where adverse news often triggers sharp volatility spikes. Incorporating E-GARCH into your analysis can help you better anticipate shifts in asset relationships during downturns versus upswings. These advanced techniques provide the nuanced insights needed for effective portfolio construction and systematic trading strategies.

Using Cross-Asset Correlation in Systematic Trading

Portfolio Construction and Diversification

Understanding correlation is crucial for building a well-balanced portfolio. It can help uncover hidden risks, particularly in emerging markets, where traditional market-cap benchmarks often overexpose portfolios to a handful of countries. For Singapore-based traders, spreading risk across regions and asset classes is key to avoiding unexpected shocks.

One effective strategy is to break down currency exposures. By analysing both base and quote currency weights, traders can identify and address concentrated positions, such as excessive USD exposure. Frameworks like Equal Risk Contribution (ERC) can further refine portfolios by reducing the weight of highly correlated assets, ensuring that each trade contributes equally to overall risk. A study by PIMCO and Singapore’s GIC highlighted that geographically distributing risk across emerging markets, while favouring lower-volatility bond markets, enhanced returns by limiting overexposure to correlated assets.

“Correlation is the grammar of portfolios. It turns a list of trades into a structured statement about risk.” – Adrian Lim, Fintech Specialist, Singapore Forex Club

To manage risk effectively, consider applying a correlation penalty to position sizing. This formula can help:
effective risk = base risk × [1 / (1 + α · average correlation to open positions)].
As correlation within your portfolio increases, this method automatically scales down trade sizes, preventing overexposure to a single theme. For instance, setting a cap on USD-related risk to no more than 3% of total portfolio risk can help avoid clustering. By December 2022, some diversified portfolios showed correlations as high as 0.96 against the Morningstar US Market Index, underscoring how diversification benefits can diminish over time.

These tools lay the groundwork for implementing stronger risk management practices.

Risk Management and Stress Testing

Traditional Value at Risk (VaR) models often fall short in capturing extreme market conditions. They rely on average correlations from stable periods, which can underestimate risks during “risk-off” scenarios. In such times, correlations in emerging markets can surge toward +1.0, eroding diversification when it’s needed most. A case in point: in 2022, the positive correlation between stocks and bonds led to a 16% drop in 60/40 portfolios – their worst performance since 2008.

Stress testing becomes essential here. By creating a stressed covariance matrix with correlations forced toward 0.8–0.9, you can simulate how your portfolio might behave during panic-driven market movements. Running such tests before major MAS policy announcements can help traders adjust their positions in time.

Here’s a quick look at how different regimes affect diversification:

Tracking correlations across different timeframes – such as 30, 90, and 180 days – can help distinguish short-term noise from longer-term shifts. For example, when US inflation exceeds 4.13%, defensive bonds may lose their diversification benefits, often moving in sync with equities. Meanwhile, historical data shows that missing the 25 best trading days for the S&P 500 between 1961 and 2015 could have slashed annual returns from 9.87% to 5.74%. This underscores the risks of panic-driven exits during high-correlation periods.

Signal Design for Systematic Traders

Building on these portfolio and risk management strategies, traders can refine their entry and exit signals. Correlation analysis can enhance signal accuracy, but liquidity challenges in emerging markets still pose hurdles. For instance, Singapore traders face transaction costs of 0.08% to 0.28% per trade, and US-listed ETFs may incur a 30% dividend withholding tax for Singapore residents.

Volatility-based indicators like the Average True Range (ATR) are particularly useful. For instance, if ATR exceeds 3% of an asset’s price, traders might scale down to 1:1 leverage or exit the position entirely. Similarly, the VIX index – often called the “fear gauge” – can signal extreme volatility. When it rises above 30, correlation spikes are likely, demanding a more cautious approach.

“Being disciplined as an investor isn’t always easy, but over time it has demonstrated the ability to generate wealth, while market timing has proven to be a costly exercise.” – Ann Dowd, Vice President, Fidelity Investments

Systematic rebalancing is another vital tool for managing portfolio drift. Whether you rebalance quarterly or based on thresholds (e.g., a 5% drift), aligning these reviews with MAS policy cycles can help capture shifts in market conditions. For CPF-linked investments, redirecting future contributions instead of selling existing holdings can help avoid penalties. While correlation analysis offers a powerful framework, it’s worth noting that 90% of traders fail not because of flawed strategies but due to a lack of discipline.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

Cross-asset correlations play a crucial role for Singapore-based traders navigating today’s interconnected global markets. With the rapid growth of emerging markets, their influence can no longer be overlooked. However, these markets bring unique challenges that require deeper analysis beyond surface-level observations.

The key takeaway here is that correlations are not static; they shift over time. What seems like a well-diversified portfolio today might become a concentrated risk tomorrow. As PIMCO aptly states:

“The relationship between securities, asset classes and markets changes often (and sometimes rapidly) owing to fundamental or technical factors”.

This is especially true in emerging markets, where correlations tend to spike during periods of stress – precisely when diversification is most critical.

To manage these risks, adopting a systematic approach is essential. Such strategies help remove emotional biases and address hidden risks from overlapping exposures. Collin Seow highlights the importance of this discipline:

“A system that simply works and aims to take all emotions out of your trades. Make profitable trades regardless of market direction”.

When traditional diversification methods falter, this kind of structured approach becomes indispensable.

Rather than relying solely on asset labels, traders should focus on the underlying risk factors. For those in Singapore, this involves monitoring currency exposure, analysing correlations across different timeframes, and adjusting position sizes with correlation penalties. Advanced techniques like multifractal analysis can uncover complex dynamics that traditional linear models often overlook, such as “fat tails” and volatility clustering common in emerging markets. These insights empower traders to build more resilient portfolio strategies.

As discussed earlier, robust correlation analysis enhances both portfolio construction and risk management. The success lies in understanding that emerging markets function as intricate systems that challenge conventional assumptions. By embedding correlation analysis into areas like portfolio design, stress testing, and signal generation, systematic traders can approach these markets with greater confidence – transforming their complexity into a strategic advantage rather than a liability.

FAQs

How can Singapore traders use cross-asset correlation to manage risks in emerging markets?

Cross-asset correlation measures how the price of one asset moves in relation to another, with values ranging from -1.0 (a perfect negative correlation) to +1.0 (a perfect positive correlation). In emerging markets, these correlations can shift rapidly, influenced by factors such as commodity price cycles, capital inflows and outflows, and geopolitical tensions. For traders in Singapore, understanding these dynamics is key to making smarter portfolio decisions.

Here are some ways traders can manage risks using correlation insights:

• Track changes in correlations: Keep an eye on how correlations evolve over time. For instance, a rising correlation between equities and bonds could signal reduced diversification benefits.
• Diversify with low or negative correlations: Pairing emerging market equities with sovereign bonds often provides stronger diversification compared to U.S. corporate bonds.
• Adjust position sizes based on correlation: Allocate larger portions to assets with weaker correlations to limit the risk of simultaneous losses across your portfolio.

For those looking to adopt a more structured approach, the Collin Seow Trading Academy offers tools and resources designed for Singapore traders. These include free e-courses, live webinars, and the “Systematic Trader v.2” book, all aimed at helping you create correlation-aware trading models tailored to the local market.

What are the best methods for analysing changing correlations in emerging markets?

To keep up with how correlations in emerging-market assets shift over time, traders often turn to dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) multivariate GARCH models. These models build on traditional GARCH by estimating a time-varying correlation matrix through a two-step process. This makes it easier to track how asset relationships evolve. They’re particularly handy for creating forward-looking correlation forecasts using daily or weekly return data.

For those who prefer a more straightforward and visual method, rolling-correlation tools are a popular choice. These tools calculate correlations over a moving window – like 20, 30, or 60 trading days – making it easier to spot periods of stronger or weaker co-movements. By combining econometric models like DCC-GARCH (accessible through platforms like Python, R, or MATLAB) with rolling-correlation dashboards, traders can get a more complete view of cross-asset relationships in emerging markets and make informed decisions.

Why do asset correlations increase during market stress, and what does this mean for diversification?

During times of market turbulence, increased volatility and a preference for safer assets can cause various investments to respond in unison to significant economic events. This often results in their returns moving in the same direction, driving correlations higher.

When correlations increase, diversification becomes less effective. Assets that usually offset each other may now rise or fall together, making it harder for traders to manage risk efficiently. Grasping these patterns is essential for making well-informed portfolio decisions, particularly in emerging markets where such dynamics can be more pronounced.